17-05-08, 01:35 PM
Forse si potrebbe aprire un topic apposito, nella sezione tecnica, comunque, riporto quanto segue da "Chrysler 300 - Gold Portfolio" pag. 11, riguardante la 300 del 1955:
"So we started right off with the acceleration tests. Taking them in sequenses, we made half a dozen runs from zero to 30 mph. this produced two surprises right off the bat. to begin with, the acceleration time were exactly the same running in "drive" range and in "low". The other surprise was not what you would expect; we were a bit disappointed with the times we got to 30. They averaged out 3.9 seconds, which is fast, all right, but not much better than several other stock sedans we had tested earlier.
Undaunted, we tried the acceleration fron zero to 60 mph. Our first run produced the sparkling time of 10.5 seconds, with the car really taking off at about 40 mph after what seemed like an excessive amount of slipping at the start. Then we did some experimenting, using combinations of low and drive, and came up with a fantastic paradox. Our best acceleration time from zero to 60 were reached by starting out in drive range and shifting into low at 40 mph! with that strange method, our time to 60 mph averaged out to a neat 9.5 seconds which, by the way, is faster than the Ford Thunderbird. We hit zero to 75 mph in 15 seconds to the nose!"
E' solo un discorso di trazione, o c'? qualcosa di pi? che pu? spiegare questa differenza di tempi in accelerazione?
"So we started right off with the acceleration tests. Taking them in sequenses, we made half a dozen runs from zero to 30 mph. this produced two surprises right off the bat. to begin with, the acceleration time were exactly the same running in "drive" range and in "low". The other surprise was not what you would expect; we were a bit disappointed with the times we got to 30. They averaged out 3.9 seconds, which is fast, all right, but not much better than several other stock sedans we had tested earlier.
Undaunted, we tried the acceleration fron zero to 60 mph. Our first run produced the sparkling time of 10.5 seconds, with the car really taking off at about 40 mph after what seemed like an excessive amount of slipping at the start. Then we did some experimenting, using combinations of low and drive, and came up with a fantastic paradox. Our best acceleration time from zero to 60 were reached by starting out in drive range and shifting into low at 40 mph! with that strange method, our time to 60 mph averaged out to a neat 9.5 seconds which, by the way, is faster than the Ford Thunderbird. We hit zero to 75 mph in 15 seconds to the nose!"
E' solo un discorso di trazione, o c'? qualcosa di pi? che pu? spiegare questa differenza di tempi in accelerazione?
La POTENZA del MUSCOLO di SCHIVARE CARICATORE!
"Mother warned me that there would be men like you driving cars like that."
![[Immagine: Copy%20of%20Scarpe1.jpg]](http://www.pdani.it/public/skylineeeeee/Copy%20of%20Scarpe1.jpg)
"Io penso al baseball quando mi svegli alla mattina. Ci penso tutto il giorno. E lo sogno di notte. L'unico momento in cui non ci penso ? quando lo sto giocando."
Carl Yastrzemski
"Mother warned me that there would be men like you driving cars like that."
"Io penso al baseball quando mi svegli alla mattina. Ci penso tutto il giorno. E lo sogno di notte. L'unico momento in cui non ci penso ? quando lo sto giocando."
Carl Yastrzemski
